Skip to Content
Peter Shurman RSS Icon Search

Conservatives slam Smith for skipping vote

May 30, 2008
By Kate Adams
BayToday.ca
Thursday, May 29, 2008

Queen?s Park ? Liberal MPP Monique Smith (Nipissing) today skipped the vote for Thornhill Progressive Conservative MPP Peter Shurman?s Bill 78, which would have provided real relief for low-income seniors and disabled persons struggling with skyrocketing property tax and assessment rates.


While members of the PC and NDP caucuses joined ranks to support the bill, every member of the Liberal Party present in the Legislature voted to defeat it. A number of key Liberals did not even show up for the vote, including the Minster Responsible for Seniors, Aileen Carroll.

?Bill 78 would have provided thousands of dollars in property tax relief annually to low-income seniors and disabled persons,? said Shurman. ?Contrast that with the meagre $250 proposed by the Liberals. This fall, the property assessment freeze will be lifted and property owners across Ontario will be hit with three years worth of increases. Which will help seniors more? $250 or the thousands of dollars proposed by Bill 78? This was a no-brainer!?

?This was a win-win proposal. The only conclusion to be drawn from this was that the Liberal caucus defeated Bill 78 because it was not a Liberal bill. Again, they put their partisanship ahead of the needs of Ontarians and in particular our seniors and disabled persons,? said Shurman.

Quotes from today?s debate:

?This bill will allow low-income seniors and disabled persons to remain independent in their homes longer. It will stimulate the economy by providing additional disposable income to low-income seniors and disabled persons, and it will provide a common property tax deferral property program across Ontario and get rid of the current patchwork system.?
Peter Shurman, PC MPP Thornhill

?Of course there is a threat this year; we are already hearing the news reports of this triple whammy after assessments had been frozen for the three previous years. That?s certainly going to be reflected in my communities, and certainly seniors and other vulnerable people on fixed incomes are simply not going to have the means nor the resources to accommodate these huge increases in their property assessments.?
Laurie Scott, PC MPP Haliburton-Kawartha Lakes-Brock

?From time to time, and it?s rare unfortunately, opposition members? private bills go to committee and after fine tuning in committee they get passed. I believe strongly this bill should go to committee?
Peter Kormos, NDP MPP Welland

?Unlike the comments by the member for Davenport?$250 and $500 is not going to do very much, particularly when on a modest income you?re looking at taxes, certainly in the city of Toronto?I?m sure in Thornhill as well?of at least $4,000 to $5,000 and more per year. I know in my riding I have seniors who are going to lose their houses if something isn?t done when these new assessments come out.?
Cheri DiNovo, NDP MPP Parkdale-High Park
A Message From Peter
Thank you for visiting www.petershurman.com. This website has been designed specifically with you in mind to help connect you to the various services and activities available in the riding of Thornhill and Ontario and to also show you first hand what I am working on.
I also want you to think of this website as another avenue to let me know what is important to you. I encourage you to browse this site as you will find local and provincial updates and information. 
It is my privilege to represent you and I welcome your comments and feedback. You can reach my Thornhill office at 905-731-8462, my Queen’s Park office at 416-325-1415, or email me at peter.shurmanco@pc.ola.org.
It is my job to make sure the people of Thornhill are well represented and I can assure you it is a job I take very seriously.
Thank you again for visiting the site and if there is anything that I can do to help please do not hesitate to contact my office and speak with Noah, Ari or Debbie.
Thank you again!
Sincerely,

Peter Shurman, MPP
Thornhill
 

Weekly Poll

Should Bills that receive all-party endorsement should be subject to partisan politics?
Choices